The peer review process undergoes scientific research papers to autonomous scrutiny by other capable scientific scholars before they are made publish on journal website. The peer review supports the editorconclusivethat the research article should be accepted, accept with major or minor changes in the manuscript, or declined. This process increases the quality of manuscript to be published. Peer reviewers require unknown, on the other hand they are now significant quantities of open peer review, and anywhere the observations are noticeable to students, researchers usually through the uniqueness of the peer referees revealed for instance.
Clinical peer review should be illustrious from the peer review that scientific journals use to appraise the qualities of a research manuscript, commencing the peer review procedure used to estimateresearch scholarshipsubmissions and moreover from the development by which medicalinstruction might be assessed.Peer review process is very common in scientific research papers this is known as clinical peer review. In spite ofdisapprovals, peer review is the individualextensivelyrecognizedtechnique for investigationendorsement.In double blind review processes mutually the referee and the author/writer are unspecified.
Expansions in health and medication are regularlyin the news captions and communalconversation. Now and thenresearchers are conveyedsuch as approximatelyincompatibleeffects. There is a methodknown as peer review that is practice by researchers/experts to choosewhether theinvestigationoutcomesought to be issued in a methodical journal. Avitalpart of Open Access is the durableconservancy of peer-reviewed academic journal manuscripts and research investigation papers.
The author of the manuscript essentiallyacquiesce it to the journal publishing supervisor who ahead the editorial to specialists in the field. The peer reviewers patterned the research articlesintended foraccurateness and evaluate the legitimacy of the research technology and processes. If suitable, then they willrecommendfor revised version of manuscript. Unknownhe will simply reject the manuscript.For the cause that a peer-review journal will not bring outmanuscripts tobe unsuccessful to come across the criteriareputable for a given persuasion, peer-reviewed manuscripts that
remain acknowledged for journal publication illustrate the top exploration performs in a field.Peer-review process, firstly manuscript submission, we do not accept the manuscript already published in some other journal. We will check for the plagiarism. If plagiarism is above 75-80% we will accept the manuscript for peer review process. If plagiarism below 75% we will send the manuscript to author to modify/changes in the manuscript and received the manuscript again. After receiving the article from author we start double blind peer review process.
We will assign the manuscript to reviewer, editorial board member/ eminent person in the respective field. Once we received reviewer comments from the reviewer we will send those reviewer comments to author of the manuscript and request for revised version. Once we get the revised version from author we will send the article to quality analyst to do the author proof. After completion of author proof we will send the final galley proof to author to confirm. Once they confirmed we will go to PDF & full text and finally available in online journal website.